LIBERALS KILLED KATE!!!
A Sanctuary City, by its definition, is a city that has decided to break Federal Law. When you break federal law, one would assume that the federal government, who is distributing our federal tax dollars, would have the right to shut off those funds...and further, prosecute the people that have decided to break federal law in federal court!
Ah, but grasshopper, that would be logical wouldn't it? And we should know by now that the liberals have twisted our government to the point that nothing is logical when it comes to how the government works, and nothing is logical when it comes to liberals being held responsible for their actions, right? I mean, if that were the case, Hillary and the whole Clinton Crime Family Syndicate would be in jail by now!
Soon, the Kate Steinle case will be adjudicated. Her killer, Lopez-Sanchez, was deported 5 times. This last time, directly as a result of San Francisco's liberal politicians and the policies they passed, he was released by California law enforcement (sheriff) without notification to ICE. ICE had specifically requested they be notified when a criminal illegal alien like Sanchez was being released. But because of San Francisco's politics, politicians and policies, they were not notified and Kate was gunned down in front of her father on the very boardwalk where I personally have walked numerous times down in the Fisherman's Wharf area. Steinle's family is now suing the California law enforcement agencies that did not notify ICE, they are suing the Bureau of Land Management because the gun used was stolen from a BLM agents car, and they are sueing San Francisco city and county. The suit states correctly, in my opinion, that "Kate's death was both foreseeable and preventable had the law enforcement agencies, officials and/or officers involved simply followed the laws...which they swore to uphold," the complaint said.
Swearing to uphold laws. Swearing to uphold the Constitution of the United States. These things seem to be somehow difficult for the left to do. When taking the oath of office, I don't care if you're in law enforcement or in the Senate or the House of Representatives or the President, you are required to swear to these things. Yet over and over again, we see Democrats - particularly in California - FAIL to uphold the very laws and Constitution that are in place in our country.
As we have stated in previous articles, we find it absurd that we have to be having this conversation at all. We feel strongly that ANYONE in public office or in law enforcement that isn't abiding by their sworn oaths should be brought up on charges and removed from active service immediately until their case if fully adjudicated. In our opinion, a congressman or senator who has taken the oath to uphold the freedoms in the Constitution that then fails to do so - or worse - tries to subvert, skirt around, limit the freedoms, or eliminate the freedoms in it, is a traitor. There is a way to change the Constitution. It's called an Amendment. If they want to change the Constitution, they need to go through the process set in place by our founding fathers and put forth an Amendment. If it passes, then they will have done it the right way, not the way of a coward, by circumventing the process and passing laws and regulations that are unconstitutional and then we are left to attempt to unwind them or fight them in court like we are with our gun laws in California.
There is no excuse for an elected official to make any moves against the freedoms in our Constitution unless they are putting forth a proposed amendment to it. To do otherwise is cowardly and borderline traitorous and should be punished by instant removal from office and charges brought for conspiring to do harm to our nation as a traitor. Maybe then the Democrats - and everyone - will think twice before they do things like create sanctuary cities and states, like they have in California. Maybe then, people like Kate Steinle won't die because of liberal politics.
California = FUBAR
REMAIN VIGILANT AMERICA!!!